<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>fortes.com - Latest Comments in Using Numerals</title><link>http://fortes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://fortes.disqus.com/using_numerals/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:13:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Using Numerals</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/05/numerals/#comment-1207745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I figured it out. It worked when I specified "Bickham Script Pro Regular" instead of "Bickham Script Pro" as FontFamily. It looks that Avalon Beta 1 running in Windows XP SP-2 uses a different set of font names than Avalon running in Longhorn that you presumably use (name id 1 vs. 16). Might be worth looking at.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Regards, &lt;br&gt;Adam&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam T</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Numerals</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/05/numerals/#comment-1207744</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use Windows XP SP-2 where I've installed the Avalon Beta 1 and the corresponding WinFX SDK. I'm testing the XAML samples in XAMLPad but somehow cannot get most of my system-installed fonts to show up in the XAML.  works fine but  does not (the font is, of course, installed in Windows XP's system folder. The only way I actually got Bickham Script Pro to render *somehow* in Avalon is    but of course this is not the idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there some additional magic I need to do so the XAMLPad output sees all the fonts installed on my system? Alternatively, is there a way to reference URIs in the FontFamily attribute?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adam&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam T</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:48:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Numerals</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/05/numerals/#comment-1207743</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, *ascenders (crap keyboard).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Daly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 17:17:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using Numerals</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/05/numerals/#comment-1207742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's great news about the font licensing if it goes ahead: I've been suffering serious font envy ever since I started reading your blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the difference, I'm woefully ignorant of typography, but in the second example it looks as if the numerals are rendered as lower-case characters with acenders and descenders, and in the first example they're um, not.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Daly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 17:39:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>