<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>fortes.com - Latest Comments in OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://fortes.disqus.com/opentype_fractions/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:29:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/04/fractions/#comment-1207670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John: You're correct that the new fonts (except Consolas) do in fact support arbitrary fractions. The font I used in my example (Segoe Script), does not though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fortes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/04/fractions/#comment-1207673</link><description>&lt;p&gt;John: You're correct that the new fonts (except Consolas) do in fact support arbitrary fractions. The font I used in my example (Segoe Script), does not though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fortes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:29:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/04/fractions/#comment-1207672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Although most fonts only contain pre-built fraction glyphs for  ¼½ and ¾, newer OpenType fonts can build arbitrary fractions using contextual substitution and sets of numerator and denominator numerals. It works like this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enter an arbitrary fraction, e.g. 7253735/89362529 and apply the Typography.Fractions property. If a font supports arbitrary fractions, the lookups will&lt;br&gt;a) change all numerals in the string to numerator glyphs,&lt;br&gt;b) change the slash glyph to a fraction bar,&lt;br&gt;c) contextually change the numerator glyph that follows the fraction bar into a denominator glyph,&lt;br&gt;d) contextually change any numerator glyph preceded by a denominator glyph to a denominator glyph.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Et voila: one arbitrary fraction. Filipe, you can try this with any of the new ClearType collection fonts (Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Constantia, Corbel -- I'm can't remember if the monospaced Consolas font supports this layout feature or not).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In reference to the preceding comment, I heard a rumour that MS and Adobe had come to an agreement re. CFF PostScript support in Avalon. Perhaps this is something that can now be officially confirmed or denied?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:58:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/04/fractions/#comment-1207669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Although most fonts only contain pre-built fraction glyphs for  ¼½ and ¾, newer OpenType fonts can build arbitrary fractions using contextual substitution and sets of numerator and denominator numerals. It works like this:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Enter an arbitrary fraction, e.g. 7253735/89362529 and apply the Typography.Fractions property. If a font supports arbitrary fractions, the lookups will&lt;br&gt;a) change all numerals in the string to numerator glyphs,&lt;br&gt;b) change the slash glyph to a fraction bar,&lt;br&gt;c) contextually change the numerator glyph that follows the fraction bar into a denominator glyph,&lt;br&gt;d) contextually change any numerator glyph preceded by a denominator glyph to a denominator glyph.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Et voila: one arbitrary fraction. Filipe, you can try this with any of the new ClearType collection fonts (Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Constantia, Corbel -- I'm can't remember if the monospaced Consolas font supports this layout feature or not).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In reference to the preceding comment, I heard a rumour that MS and Adobe had come to an agreement re. CFF PostScript support in Avalon. Perhaps this is something that can now be officially confirmed or denied?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Hudson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:58:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/04/fractions/#comment-1207671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, most fonts not commissioned by Microsoft are PostScript based (including most OpenType fonts). And the current docs say you're not supporting these. So eventhough this is a really cool feature, I don't think this is going be very useful unless you're actually going to implement OpenType fully (that is, including CFF/PostScript support). Linotype Zapfino Extra would be an excellent showcase for OpenType features.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OpenType Fractions</title><link>http://fortes.com/2005/04/fractions/#comment-1207668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, most fonts not commissioned by Microsoft are PostScript based (including most OpenType fonts). And the current docs say you're not supporting these. So eventhough this is a really cool feature, I don't think this is going be very useful unless you're actually going to implement OpenType fully (that is, including CFF/PostScript support). Linotype Zapfino Extra would be an excellent showcase for OpenType features.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ruben</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>