http://fortes.disqus.com/enFri, 06 May 2005 12:33:57 -0000http://fortes.com/2005/05/transforms/#comment-1207700<p>Jonah: We've changed that in the next CTP to be more consistent.</p>FortesFri, 06 May 2005 12:33:57 -0000http://fortes.com/2005/05/transforms/#comment-1207698<p>Jonah: We've changed that in the next CTP to be more consistent.</p>FortesFri, 06 May 2005 12:33:57 -0000http://fortes.com/2005/05/transforms/#comment-1207699<p>Why is the layout-affecting transform a container (TransformDecorator) while the render-only transform is an attribute?</p><p>Why the different naming convention, i.e., why is TransformDecorator not LayoutTransform? Is there a decorator pattern in Avalon?</p>jonahbThu, 05 May 2005 21:22:55 -0000http://fortes.com/2005/05/transforms/#comment-1207697<p>Why is the layout-affecting transform a container (TransformDecorator) while the render-only transform is an attribute?</p><p>Why the different naming convention, i.e., why is TransformDecorator not LayoutTransform? Is there a decorator pattern in Avalon?</p>jonahbThu, 05 May 2005 21:22:55 -0000